upravlenieГосударственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые запискиState and municipal management. Scholar notes2079-16902687-0290Южно-Российский институт управления10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-126-133upravlenie-296Research ArticleПРОБЛЕМЫ ЭКОНОМИКИPROBLEMS OF ECONOMICSПрирода и форма знаний в экономикеThe nature and form of knowledge in the economyМельниковаТ. Б.MelnikovaT. B.

Татьяна Борисовна Мельникова  – кандидат экономических наук, доцент

Севастополь

Tatyana B. Melnikova – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Sevastopol

tmln82@mail.ruСевастопольский филиал Российского экономического университета им. Г. В. ПлехановаРоссияSevastopol branch of Plekhanov Russian University of EconomicsRussian Federation20232311202501126133Copyright © Мельникова Т.Б., 20252025Мельникова Т.Б.Melnikova T.B.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://upravlenie-uriu.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/296

На протяжении долгого периода времени знания рассматриваются как важный элемент экономического развития как в практическом, так и теоретическом аспектах. Данная статья нацелена на изучение и систематизацию основных теоретических особенностей включения знания в экономические модели. В моделях производства знаний данный ресурс является входящим для функций производства технологий и генерации знаний, способствуя в большей мере либо снижению издержек, либо накоплению информации. В моделях распространения знаний учитываются типы участников процесса передачи знания и их поглощающая способность. В результате экономические модели выявляют закономерности положительных и отрицательных внешних эффектов от создания и распространения знаний. 

For a long period of time, knowledge has been regarded as an important element of  economic development, both in practical and theoretical aspects. This article is aimed at studying and  systematizing the main theoretical features of the inclusion of knowledge in economic models. In models of knowledge production, this resource is an input for the functions of technology production and knowledge generation, contributing to a greater extent either to reduce costs or to accumulate information. Knowledge diffusion models take into account the types of participants in the knowledge transfer process and their absorptive capacity. As a result, economic models reveal patterns of positive and negative externalities from knowledge creation and dissemination.

знаниеэкономическая модельинформациядиффузияраспространение знанийknowledgeeconomic modelinformationdiffusiondissemination of knowledgeReferencesКлейнер Г.Б. Интеллектуальная экономика нового века: экономика постзнаний // Экономическое возрождение России. 2020. №1(63). С. 35–42.Kleiner G.B. Intellectual economy of the new century: post-knowledge economy. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic revival of Russia. 2020;1(63);35–42. (In Russ.)Capello R., Nijkamp P. Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories. Cheltenha. – UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.Capello R., Nijkamp P. Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories. Cheltenha. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2009.Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. – New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. 1995.Nissen M. E., Bordetsky A. Leveraging mobile network technologies to accelerate tacit knowledge flows across organisations and distances // Chandos Information Professional Series, Technology and Knowledge Flow. – Chandos Publishing, 2011.Nissen M. E., Bordetsky A. Leveraging mobile network technologies to accelerate tacit knowledge flows across organisations and distances. Chandos Information Professional Series, Technology and Knowledge Flow. Chandos Publishing. 2011.Kobayashi K. Knowledge Network and Market Structure: An Analytical Perspective // Networks in Action. – Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995.Kobayashi K. Knowledge Network and Market Structure: An Analytical Perspective. Networks in Action. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. 1995.Antonelli C., Orsatti G., Pialli G. The effects of the limited exhaustibility of knowledge on firm size and the direction of technological change // The Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2022.Antonelli C., Orsatti G., Pialli G. The effects of the limited exhaustibility of knowledge on firm size and the direction of technological change. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2022.Stiglitz J. E., Greenwald B. Creating a learning society: a new approach to growth, development, and social progress. – New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Stiglitz J. E., Greenwald B. Creating a learning society: a new approach to growth, development, and social progress. – New York: Columbia University Press. 2015.Arrow K. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing // The Review of Economic Studies. 1962. Vol. 29, No. 3. P. 155-173.Arrow K. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies. 1962;29(3):155-173.Vahabi M. A critical survey of J. K. Arrow’s theory of knowledge // MPRA Paper No. 37888, 2012.Vahabi M. A critical survey of J. K. Arrow’s theory of knowledge. MPRA Paper No. 37888. 2012.Romer P. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth // The Journal of Political Economy. 1986. Vol. 94, No. 5. P. 1002-1037.Romer P. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy. 1986;94(5):1002-1037.Romer P. Endogenous Technological Change // Working Paper №3210. – National Bureau of Economic Research, 1989.Romer P. Endogenous Technological Change. Working Paper №3210. National Bureau of Economic Research. 1989.Agnion P., Howitt P. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction // Working paper №527. MIT, 1989. 13. Klarl T. Knowledge Diffusion Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations // Thesis for Doctoral, 2009. URL: https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1484/file/Dissertation_Klarl.pdf.Agnion P., Howitt P. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Working paper №527. MIT. 1989.Klarl T. Knowledge Diffusion Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. Thesis for Doctoral. 2009. URL: https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1484/file/Dissertation_Klarl.pdf.Klarl T. Knowledge Diffusion Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations. Thesis for Doctoral. 2009. URL: https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1484/file/Dissertation_Klarl.pdf.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.