Digital transformation of the University as a scientific and educational corporation: institutional architecture and development subsystems
EDN: ANPTUF
Abstract
Introduction. Digital transformation has become one of the key directions in the development of higher education, setting new requirements for the organization of research, teaching and innovation activities in universities. Experience with national projects and development programmes shows that the expansion of digital infrastructure by itself does not automatically lead to the renewal of universities’ institutional mechanisms. This highlights the need for conceptual models that make it possible to analyze digital change at the level of the university as an integrated institution rather than as a set of isolated technological initiatives.
The purpose of the study is to conceptualize the digital transformation of the university as a process which, in the logic of a scientific-educational corporation, links together research, educational and innovation-entrepreneurial domains and thereby reshapes the configuration of the university as a socio-economic institution.
Theoretical background and methods. The study draws on institutional and systems approaches to the university, which frame it as a set of interconnected subsystems of research, education and innovation-entrepreneurial activity. The key analytical lens is the model of the university as a scientific-educational corporation, in which the processes of knowledge generation, competence formation and market-oriented innovation are treated as a single, interrelated development contour. Methodologically, the article represents a theoretical study and includes an analysis of policy documents and analytical reports on the digital development of universities, as well as conceptual modelling of digital changes in the three subsystems of the university and of the mechanisms of their institutional integration.
Results. The study shows that the development of digital research infrastructures and data-intensive practices may lead to a reconfiguration of research regimes and to stronger network embeddedness of university research teams. It clarifies how a digitally enabled learning environment, when integrated into university governance, can serve as an instrument for constructing individual learning trajectories and for involving students in research and project formats. In the domain of market-oriented innovation, digital platforms for project management and interaction with external partners are considered as a means of embedding entrepreneurial activity into the overall university framework. Taken together, these elements are interpreted as characteristics of a mechanism for the institutional integration of the three subsystems and for the formation of a coherent model of the university as a scientific educational corporation.
Conclusions. The article argues that the digital transformation of the university should be understood as a long-term process of institutional design rather than as a set of technical solutions. The proposed conceptual model can serve as a basis for assessing the extent to which universities’ digital initiatives contribute to the alignment of research, educational and innovation-entrepreneurial activities and to strengthening their position within the digital economy.
About the Author
N. M. AbramovaRussian Federation
Natalia M. Abramova – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), independent researcher
Moscow
References
1. Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation of education. Edited by A.Y. Uvarov, I.D. Frumin (eds.). Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. 2019. 342 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-1990-5 (In Russ.)
2. Usacheva O.V., Chernyakov M.K. Assessment of universities' readiness for the transition to a digital educational environment. Higher education in Russia. 2020;29(5):53-62. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-5-53-62. (In Russ.)
3. Dneprovskaya N.V. Assessment of the readiness of Russian higher education for the digital economy. Statistics and Economics. 2018;(4):16–28. https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2018-4-16-28. (In Russ.)
4. Larionov V.G., Sheremetyeva E.N., Gorshkova L.A. Digital transformation of higher education: technologies and digital competencies. Bulletin of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics. 2021;(2):61–69. https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-5537-2021-2-61-69. (In Russ.)
5. Eleneva Yu.Ya., Mozharovskaya A.A., Demushkin D.I. Digital transformation of educational institutions of higher education: current state, tasks, risks. Economics, entrepreneurship and law. 2024;14(4):1149-1170. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.14.4.120670. (In Russ.)
6. Kobicheva A.M. Analysis of existing barriers to the digital transformation of higher education. Actual problems of science and practice. 2024;4(37):33–38. (In Russ.)
7. Egorova L.E., Sandler D.G. Universities' readiness for digital transformation: a managerial aspect. University management: practice and analysis. 2024;28(3):17–31. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2024.03.022. (In Russ.)
8. Aksenova N.I., Usacheva O.V., Chernyakov M.K. Rating assessment of the state of digitalization of universities. Education and Science. 2024;26(7):88–115. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-7-88-115. (In Russ.)
9. Abramova N. M. The University of tomorrow as a framework for scientific-educational corporation: conceptualization and systematic properties. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2025;(4):93– 100. (In Russ.). EDN KLDMQA
10. Tang J, Huang P, Yan S. Digital transformation in higher education: logical framework, practical dilemmas, and implementation approaches. Front Psychol. 2025 Nov 6;16:1565591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565591. PMID: 41280162; PMCID: PMC12631623
11. Jane Radecki, Rebecca Springer. Research Data Services in US Higher Education. A Web-Based Inventory. Research Report. November 18, 2020, Ithaka S+R. https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/SR-Report-Research-Data-Services-US-Higher-Ed-111820.pdf
12. Larionov V.G., Sheremetyeva E.N., Gorshkova L.A. Digital transformation of higher education: technologies and digital competencies. Bulletin of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Economics. 2021;(2):61–69. https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-5537-2021-2-61-69. (In Russ.)
13. Similarities and differences in the digital transformation of higher education. Perspectives from Africa, the Arab region, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Report. Available from: https://eua.eu/images/publications/Publication_PDFs/GUAF_SPHERE_report.pdf
14. Fernandez A, Gomez B, Binyaku K, Meches E.K. Digital transformation initiatives in higher education institutions: a review of literature in several languages. Educational Technology (Dordr). 2023, March 9:1-32. The publication in Epub format is preceded by a stamp. PMID: 37361743; PMCID: PMC9995251. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11544-0
15. Shugal N.B., Bondarenko N.V., Varlamova T. A., et al. The digital environment in educational institutions at various levels: an analytical report; National Research University "Higher School of Economics". Moscow: HSE; 2023. 164 p. ISBN: 978-5-7598-2745-0. (In Russ.)
16. Features of the functioning of digital campuses and online Master's degree programs: an analysis of Russian and foreign experience / T. E. Havenson, A. E. Korczak; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education. Moscow: HSE; 2024. 162 p. (Modern Education Analytics. № 6 (80)). (In Russ.)
17. Roberts E., Easley S. Impact on Entrepreneurship: the role of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, February 2009, Kaufman Foundation. Available from: https://www.kauffman.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mit_impact_full_report.pdf
Review
For citations:
Abramova N.M. Digital transformation of the University as a scientific and educational corporation: institutional architecture and development subsystems. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2026;(2):9-20. (In Russ.) EDN: ANPTUF
JATS XML



























