Municipal administration in the territories of mountaineer resettlement: problems and resolution mechanisms (on the example of the Republic of Dagestan)

Introduction. The lack of legal status for settlements on transhumance lands in Dagestan has led to interethnic and territorial conflicts for several decades. According to the Dagestan Ministry of Agriculture, as of May 2024, approximately 100,000 people live in 124 settlements on transhumance lands. Legally, the population is assigned to mountainous regions, but the settlements do not have municipal status because they are located on agricultural lands. Despite this, 78 schools with very limited legal authority, 16 preschools, outpatient clinics, first-aid stations, and stores have been built and are currently operating in the transhumance territories. Gasification has been established, roads, and other infrastructure have been constructed.

Purpose. The author aims to examine the historical context of the formation of these territories and develop recommendations for overcoming this problem. An examination of the history of the highlanders' migration to the plains and its analysis will allow us to understand the development of technological, environmental, economic, social, territorial, and interethnic relations in the transhumance territories.

Materials and Methods. The methodological basis of the study was a historical, archival, and contextual analysis of documents from the Central State Archives of the Republic of Dagestan, including historiography on the topic, as well as analytical reviews from agencies overseeing the situation in the transhumance territories.

Results. An analysis of legislative acts regulating public administration in transhumance areas revealed a contradiction that subsequently led to difficulties with municipal governance in these areas. Vague wording created the potential for corruption in the purchase and sale of lands belonging to the inalienable fund and the construction of capital structures on them.

Conclusions. To overcome the legal conflict in municipal governance of settlements on transhumance lands, the author proposes: 1. determining the actual areas necessary for the development of transhumance; 2. removing the remaining lands from the fund of inalienable agricultural lands and granting them the status of settlements, with subsequent incorporation into the municipalities in which they are located; Develop a sustainable development program for this territory at the government level of the Republic of Dagestan, taking into account historical, interethnic, territorial, environmental, economic, and legal factors, as well as the proposals and interests of the population itself.

1. Babakhanov S. G., Zerbaliev A. M. Features of regulation of land relations on the lands provided for transhumance in the Republic of Dagestan. Land management, cadastre and land monitoring. 2023;(2):91– 95. (In Russ.) 10.33920/sel-04-2302-05

2. Dalgat E.M. On the nature of land ownership in Dagestan in the 18th –early 20th centuries.History, archeology and ethnography of the Caucasus. 2017;13(3):35–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32653/CH13335-43

3. Gadzhiev K. T. Lands for the development of settlements as an object of municipal legal regulation: Abstract of dis. ... Cand. of Law: 12.00.02. Moscow; 2011. 23 p. (In Russ.)

4. Ibragimov M.-R. A. Changes in the Settlement Patterns of the Peoples of Dagestan in Connection with the Migration Movement. In: Traditional and New in the Modern Life of Dagestan Migrants. M.A. Aglarov (ed.). Makhachkala: Dag-FAN SSSR; 1981. P. 5–18. (In Russ.)

5. Osmanov A. I. Agrarian Transformations in Dagestan and the Migration of Highlanders to the Plain (1920s–1970s). Makhachkala: Institute of History, Archaeology, and Ethnography, Dagestan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2000. 333 p.

6. Gadzhieva A. A. Normative-legal regulation of transhumance livestock farming in the Republic of Dagestan and problems of its improvement. UEPS: Management, Economics, Politics, Sociology. 2021;(4):44–49. EDN: OBTMJY. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2412-2025-2021-4-44-49

7. Agasieva N. M. Socio-economic factors of migration of the peoples of southern Dagestan. Bulletin of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography. 2007;(10):73–80. EDN: OQKTOV.

8. Musalov M. A. Actual problems of the legal regime of transhumance lands in the Republic of Dagestan. Agrarian and land law. 2022;10(214):89–92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1329_2022_10_89

9. Intigrinova T. P., Mironova N. I., Sokolov D. V., Starodubrovskaya I. V. Some issues of land use in transhumance zones of the North Caucasus. Transactions of the Geographical Society of the Republic of Dagestan. 2012;(40):36–48. EDN RJROGB. (In Russ.)

10. Karpov Yu. Yu. Ethnosocial transformations in the context of migration processes (on the example of Dagestan). In: The North Caucasus in the national strategy of Russia. Collection of articles. Moscow; 2008. P. 95–115. EDN: TJEACZ. (In Russ.)