The university of tomorrow as a framework for scientific-educational corporation: conceptualization and systematic properties

Introduction. Digital transformation and global challenges are casting doubt on the effectiveness of the traditional university model. Within academic discourse, transformation of the classic university into the scientific-educational corporation (SEC) is proposed as a promising response to these challenges; however, the conceptual foundations and systemic properties of this format remain insufficiently explored.

Purpose. To justify the concept of the scientific-educational corporation as a fundamentally new institutional form of higher education institution that best corresponds to the characteristics of the current stage of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, to define its key systemic properties, and to identify promising directions for further institutional transformation.

The theoretical and methodological foundation of this research is rooted in an interdisciplinary approach that integrates the theory of institutional change and a historical-comparative analysis of the evolution of university formats. It is argued that the scientific-educational corporation represents not an evolutionary progression, but rather a radically new form of integration of science, education, and entrepreneurship, driven by a profound technological shift.

Results. The article presents the author’s original concept of the scientific-educational corporation as an integrated socio-economic institution built around a triadic core—science, education, and entrepreneurship. Four principal systemic properties of the SEC are identified and systematized: (1) acting as a systemic integrator of economy and society; (2) having a network-based architecture for both internal organization and external relations; (3) exerting broad influence determined by deep integration with the real sector; and (4) demonstrating a proactive, forward-oriented approach to development.

Conclusions. Effective implementation of the scientific-educational corporation paradigm requires the deliberate cultivation of a favorable institutional environment, incorporating tailored legislative frameworks, hybrid financial instruments, and innovative governance systems. The success of this transformation can only be ensured through the collaborative engagement of government, universities, and the business community.

1. Joel Mokyr. The gifts of Aphrodite. Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Translated from English by N. Edelman; edited by M. Ivanova. Moscow: Ed. Gaidar Institute, 2013. 408 p. (In Russ.)

2. Klyachko T. L., Mau V. A. The future of universities. Moscow: Publishing House "Delo" RANEPA; 2015. 64 p. (Scientific reports: education). ISBN 978–5–7749–1040–3 (In Russ.)

3. Dezhina I. G. The development of science in Russian universities as a new priority of the state. Sociology of Science and Technology. 2011;2(2):38–47. EDN ONRDCP. (In Russ.)

4. Konstantinova L. V., Titova E. S., Petrov A. M., Shtykhno D. A. On some positive trends in the development of university science in Russia at the present stage. Higher education in Russia. 2024;33(4):101–122. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-4-101-122. EDN WZYXLO. (In Russ.)

5. Burton R. Clark. Creation of entrepreneurial universities. Organizational directions of transformation. Translated from English. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2019. 240 p. ISBN 978-5-7598-1997-4. (In Russ.)

6. Rothblatt S. The Modern University and Its Discontents: The Fate of Newman's Legacies in Britain and America. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

7. Christensen C. M., Eyring H. J. The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education from the Inside Out. Jossey-Bass, 2011.

8. Ryapolov V. V. The emergence of medieval universities: content and forms of education. Business and Design Review. 2018;1(9):15. (In Russ.)

9. Rüegg W., ed. A History of the University in Europe. Vol. I: Universities in the Middle Ages. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 586 p.

10. Uvarov P. Yu. From schools to university: the birth of a corporation. In: Urban communities of Western Europe in the Middle Ages. Ed. by P.Yu. Uvarov, G.A. Popova. Moscow: Indrik, 2018. P. 277–305. (In Russ.)

11. Kolontaevskaya I. F. Corporate governance: legal aspects. Bulletin of the S.Y. Witte Moscow University. Series 2. Legal sciences. 2018;3(17):41–50. https://doi.org/10.21777/2587-9472-2018-3-41-49 EDN: YOIPQD. (In Russ.)

12. Avdasheva S. B., Dolgopyatova T. G., Pleines H. Corporate governance in state-owned joint-stock companies: Russian problems in the context of international experience. Monograph. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2007. 50 p. EDN: QRYLQZ (In Russ.)

13. Chanko A.D., Basner A. A.V. Corporate universities: an analysis of activities in international studies. The Russian Journal of Management. 2015;13(3):79–110 (In Russ.)

14. Paltsev M. A. Features of building a corporate governance system in a university. Bulletin of Science and Education. 2007;(10):22–30. (In Russ.)

15. Efremov V. S., Vladimirova I. G., Efremov S. V., Butkovskaya G. V. Scientific and educational corporation: principles and prospects of development: a monograph. Moscow: State University of Management; 2007. 198 p. ISBN 978-5-215-01942-9. EDN QWDSVJ. (In Russ.)

16. Bakshtanovskiy V. I., Bogdanov M. V., Sogomonov Yu. V. University as a scientific and educational corporation: the dualism of self-identification and the choice of priority. Philosophical Sciences. 2009;(3):78–95. EDN: NVVIRT. (In Russ.)

17. Ippolitov S. S. Scientific and educational corporation as the basis of the state's venture policy. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts. 2025;1(123). EDN: DTWKRG (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1997-0803-2025-1123-83-95