Preview

State and municipal management. Scholar notes

Advanced search

Improving the quality assessment of internal financial audit in the main administrator of federal budget funds

EDN: GUKQGV

Abstract

Introduction. The current realities of the Russian economy are characterized by increasing demands on the efficiency and effectiveness of budgetary funds formation and expenditure, which necessitates the importance of ensuring accountability for public finance management. Internal financial audit analyzes public finance management separately within each principal administrator of federal budget funds. Assessing the quality of this analysis is the subject of this study.

Purpose. Based on a study of the powers to organize and implement internal financial audits by individual participants in the budget process, as well as a comparative analysis of budget legislation regulating them, develop a comprehensive model for assessing the quality of internal financial audits in the main administrators of federal budget funds.

Methods. The main methods in the study were system analysis to assess the relationship between the powers to organize and implement internal financial audit in the main administrators of federal budget funds and indicators for assessing the quality of their implementation, as well as structural and functional to determine the concepts characterizing the quality of internal financial audit in the main administrators of federal budget funds.

Results and Conclusions. The analyzed current approaches to checking and analyzing the effectiveness of internal financial audit in the main administrators of federal budget funds, carried out by state financial control bodies, do not meet the criteria of complexity and are aimed exclusively at assessing compliance with the requirements of budget legislation. In order to comprehensively assess the quality of internal financial audit in the main administrators of federal budget funds, according to the authors, it is necessary to carry out a quantitative assessment of the execution of relevant powers, including taking into account the opinion of the subject of budgetary procedures based on the results of audit activities. The developed model for assessing the quality of internal financial audit can also be used to assess the implementation of relevant powers by other participants in the budget process.

About the Authors

N. Yu. Kovalev
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
Россия

Nikolay Yu. Kovalev – Postgraduate Student of the Department of Accounting and Auditing

Moscow



G. V. Yaroshenko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, South-Russian Institute of Management
Россия

Galina V. Yaroshenko – Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor, Deputy Director

Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Abisheva, A. Kh. Features of interaction between the main administrator of budget funds and the recipient of budget funds. Youth. Science. Future. 2024: Collection of articles of the II International scientific and practical conference, Petrozavodsk, April 22, 2024. - Petrozavodsk: IP Ivanovskaya I. I., 2024. - P. 9-12. (In Russ.).

2. Volodina, E. V. Actual issues of reporting by main administrators, recipients of budget funds. Accounting in budgetary and non-profit organizations. 2009; (5 (221)): 15-21. (In Russ.)

3. Sedova ML. Financing of national projects. Economy. Taxes. Law. 2020;13(3):17-27. – https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2020-13-3-17-27. (In Russ.).

4. Frumina SV. Budget expenditures: selective assessment of efficiency. Siberian financial school. 2021;4(144):141-147. (In Russ.)

5. Tugushev RI. Expenditures on national projects in the system of public expenditures. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(4(125)):47-54. DOI 10.17803/1994-1471.2021.125.4.047-054. (In Russ.)

6. Mikheev VV. On the possibility of expanding the functionality of OBAS in order to increase the validity of the planned volumes of budgetary allocations of the federal budget. Topical Issues of Modern Economy. 2023;11:392-415. (In Russ.)

7. Mikheev VV. On a possible direction for improving the use of justifications for budgetary allocations and justifications for planned estimate indicators in the budget process at the federal level. Topical Issues of Modern Economy. 2024;8:322-335. (In Russ.)

8. Azhogina NN. Features of the budget and tax policy of Russia at the present stage. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2014;3:119-124. (In Russ.)

9. Zolochevskaya EY, Skidan AV, Arkhipova KS. Tax administration trends in modern economic conditions. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023;1:68-75. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-68-75. (In Russ.)

10. Nechaev AA. Assessment of the effectiveness of public administration of budget revenues in the context of modern crisis manifestations in the economy of the Russian Federation. Economic Sciences. 2022;213:47-53. doi:10.14451/1.213.47. (In Russ.)

11. Nechaev AA. Analysis of the effectiveness of public administration of budget revenues in the context of the structure of budget revenues of the Russian Federation. Economic Sciences. 2022;213:54-58. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.213.54. (In Russ.)

12. Skidan AV, Arkhipova KS. Features of the fulfillment of tax obligations by state-owned institutions. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023;4:109-115. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-4- 109-115. (In Russ.)

13. Burdin KK, Martirosyan LA, Pyshkov AY. State budget deficit and surplus: concept, sources of financing. Alley of Science. 2020;1(4):115-119. (In Russ.)

14. Aminjonova FA. Public debt as a source of financing the budget deficit: problems and prospects. International Scientific Journal. 2021;5:40-47. https://doi.org/10.34286/1995-4638-2021-80-5-40-47. (In Russ.)

15. Mardanova ER. Budget deficit and prospects for its financing from internal sources. Modern Science. 2022;1-1:62-67. (In Russ.)

16. Kovalev NY, Belogina NS. Effectiveness of internal audit: a review of empirical studies. In: Proceedings of the V International Student Scientific Conference, Moscow, June 15-16, 2023. Moscow: NRNU MEPhI; 2023:698-704. (In Russ.)

17. Arena M, Azzone G. Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing. 2009;13(1):43-60.

18. Dittenhofer M. Internal auditing effectiveness: an expansion of present methods. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2001;16(8):443-450.

19. Bednarek P. Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: a survey of the polished private and public sectors. In: Efficiency in Business and Economics. Springer; 2018:1-16.

20. Bota-Avram C, Popa I, Stefanescu C. Methods of measuring the performance of internal audit. The Annals of the «Stefan Cel Mare» University of Suceava. 2010;10:137-146.

21. Soh DSB, Martinov-Bennie N. The internal audit function: perceptions of internal audit roles, effectiveness and evaluation. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2011;26(7):605-622.

22. Brandon D. External auditor evaluations of outsourced internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 2010;29(2):159-173.

23. Sanzhieva IS. On the issue of ensuring the principle of objectivity and independence of internal audit. Issues of Humanitarian Sciences. 2019;4(103):25-27.(In Russ.).

24. Zakharchenko AN. How to ensure the independence and objectivity of internal financial audit. Finkontrol. 2021;4(26):11-17. (In Russ.)

25. Dvoretskaya VV. The possibility and necessity of ensuring the independence of internal auditors in the budgetary sphere. Intellectual Property Exchange. 2018;17(9):7-10. (In Russ.)

26. Konan KL. Trends in the development of internal audit as a tool for improving the efficiency of an organization. Society. 2022;1-1(24):64-71. (In Russ.)

27. Tarasova NV. The effectiveness of internal audit as a tool for economic security of an organization. First Economic Journal. 2022;10(328):70-77. https://doi.org/10.58551/20728115_2022_10_70. (In Russ.)

28. Tarasenko AN. Improving Methodological Approaches to Assessing the Quality of Internal Financial Audit. Financial Economy. 2024;3:71-75. (In Russ.)

29. Lin S, Pizzini M, Vargus M, Bardhan I. The role of the internal audit function in the disclosure of material weaknesses. The Accounting Review. 2011;86(1):287-323.

30. Gramling AA, Myers PM. Internal auditing’s role in ERM. The Internal Auditor. 2006;63(2):52, 56-58.

31. Kovalev NY, Belogina NS. Competence of the internal auditor as a key factor in the trust of the external auditor. In: Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference of the International Network Institute in the Field of AML/CFT; 2023 Nov 22-24; Moscow, Russia. Moscow: National Research Nuclear University MEPhI; 2023:357-362. (In Russ.)

32. Desai N, Gerard G, Tripathy A. Internal audit sourcing arrangements and reliance by external auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2011;30(1):149-171.

33. Knechel WR, Krishnan GV, Pevzner M, Shefchik LB, Velury V. Audit quality: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2013;32(S1):385-421.

34. Savina AD. Requirements and Assessment of the Competence of QMS Auditors. Science through the Prism of Time. 2022;5(62):19-21. (In Russ.)

35. Konik NV, Shutova OA, Sinitsa VV. Competence of the internal auditor as a tool for ensuring the development of the company. Agrarian Russia. 2022; 10:36-41. https://doi.org/10.30906/1999-5636-2022-10-36-41. (In Russ.)

36. Savina AD, Saldaeva EY. Methods for Assessing Auditors' Competence. Synergy of Sciences. 2021; 66:456- 459. (In Russ.)

37. Agustiawan A, Yusoff MNH, Abdullah T. Bibliometric Analysis of Internal Audit Quality of Public Sector Organizations. In: Mansour N, Bujosa L, editors. Islamic Finance. Contributions to Management Science. Springer; 2024.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_2

38. Roussy M, Brivot M. Internal audit quality: a polysemous notion? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2016;29(5):714-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2014-1843

39. Fedchenko EA, Gusarova LV. Methodological approaches to assessing the quality of internal audit organization in the public administration sector. Financial Management. 2023;2-2:38-46. (In Russ.).

40. Plotnikov DM, Mikhailovsky GB. Analysis of methodological provisions for assessing the level of effectiveness of internal financial audit applied by state financial control bodies. Bulletin of the State University of Education. Series: Economics. 2023; 4:73-85. (In Russ.).

41. Postula M, et al. Internal Audit as a Tool to Improve the Efficiency of Public Service. European Research Studies Journal. 2020; XXIII(3):699-715.

42. Kganakga NN, Schutte D, Derbyshire LE. An analysis of audit committee disclosure practices in South African metropolitan municipalities. Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research. 2023; 25(1):95-108.

43. Coetzee P, Erasmus LJ. What drives and measures public sector internal audit effectiveness? Dependent and independent variables. International Journal of Auditing. 2017; 21(3): 237–248.


Review

For citations:


Kovalev N.Yu., Yaroshenko G.V. Improving the quality assessment of internal financial audit in the main administrator of federal budget funds. State and municipal management. Scholar notes. 2025;(4):149-161. (In Russ.) EDN: GUKQGV

Views: 36

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-1690 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0290 (Online)