Digital currencies as a tool for developing the tax administration process: a comparison of the architecture of the digital ruble and foreign digital currencies

   Introduction. Digital currencies have quickly become one of the principles of digitalization of the financial system. Following the emergence of a large number of scientific projects on digital currencies, the issues of creating reliable digital currencies have been implemented at the state level. Since digital currencies can influence not only monetary conversion, but also national sovereignty and strengthen settlements, the issue of their quality is becoming increasingly relevant, especially in the context of sanctions pressure and technological transformations. Research into various approaches to the architecture of digital currencies can reveal them as a reliable tool for implementing financial and tax policies.

  Purpose. The authors aim to analyze how differences in blockchain architecture and the degree of centralization affect the efficiency, programmability and international compatibility of national digital currencies. As a specific research task, we compare the digital ruble with similar projects in other cou-tries – China, Brazil, Sweden, Iran and the EU. The analysis focuses on architectural solutions as key factors determining not only technical characteristics, but also economic and political consequences.

   Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the study was a comparative institutionalanalysis, a case study of six national digital currency projects, and the interpretation of official technical documents and regulatory acts. Elements of parametric modeling were used to assess the impact of architectural solutions on transaction costs, settlement speed, and automation capabilities.

   Results. The authors established a relationship between the architectural solutions of the digital currency and the substantive characteristics of its application. It was found that centralized models, similar to the one used in the digital ruble, provide a high level of control, but limit cross-border scalability. Hybrid architectures, like those in China and Brazil, allow achieving a balance between control and flexibility. It is shown that architectural parameters directly affect economic efficiency, especially in the context of cross-border payments and programmable budget transfers.

   Conclusions. The article substantiates the thesis that the architecture of the digital currency blockchain is not a technical, but an economic and strategic variable. The choice of design determines not only the functionality, but also the integration potential of national digital currencies. The CBDC architecture becomes a platform for the implementation of "invisible technologies" that ensure automatic compliance with the rules without the need for direct intervention. In this context, the digital ruble, while maintaining the current configuration, requires additional steps towards interoperability and expansion of functional interfaces for integration with both the national tax system and future international settlement circuits.

1. Dzionik V. R. Digital ruble: prerequisites, prospects and consequences of its introduction into civil circulation. Journal of Legal and Economic Research. 2024;(1):63-68. DOI: 10.26163/GIEF.2024.78.90.010. EDN: GEPYOX. (In Russ.)

2. Allen S. Design options for the central bank's digital currency: Political and Technical considerations. NBER Working Paper. No. 27634 (August 2020). DOI: 10.3386/w27634.

3. Zainutdinova E. V. Digital rights and digital currency in Russian law: issues of legal nature and correlation. The legal paradigm. 2022;21(4):159–167. DOI: 10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2022.4.22. EDN: DDOWJC. (In Russ.)

4. Xi Yuan Jing, Yun Xia. CEV Framework: a system for evaluating and verifying the central bank's digital currency with an emphasis on consensus algorithms and functioning architecture. IEEE Access. 10 (2022), 63698-63714. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3183092.

5. Giulio Soana & Thomaz Arruda, "Central Bank Digital Currencies and financial integrity: find-ing a new trade-off between privacy and traceability within a changing financial architecture," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, 2024;25(4):467–486. DOI: 10.1057/s41261-024-00241-2

6. Kuvaeva Yu.V., Sedunova E. A. Conceptual approaches of the Russian and Swedish models of the central bank digital currency. Bankovskoe delo. 2021;(10):8–13. (In Russ.)

7. Tao Zhang, Zhigang Huang. Blockchain and the central bank's digital currency. ICT Express. 8 (2022), pp. 264-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.icte.2021.09.014.

8. Ying Lan et al. TrustCross: Ensuring confidential interoperability between blockchains using trusted equipment. In: Proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications (ICBTA 2021, Xi'an, China), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2021. pp. 17-23. DOI: 10.1145/3510487.3510491.

9. Yakusheva E. The digital ruble as a national digital currency: problems and prospects of development in the context of world experience. Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2024;17(4):254–277. DOI: 10.17323/2072 8166.2024.4.254.277.

10. Rulev G., Krikunov V. Development of a prototype of a central bank digital currency based on DLT in the Corda network. Journal of Advances in Information Technology. 2025;16(2):198-203. DOI: 10.12720/jait.16.2.198-203.